• To: Paul Spencer <xml-dev@b...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:26:24 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <NBBBIBMKFOFCNEBAKDPLEEHPGCAA.xml-dev@b...>
• References: <oprstl350fezizxn@localhost> <NBBBIBMKFOFCNEBAKDPLEEHPGCAA.xml-dev@b...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Paul Spencer scripsit:

> They tried XML down the wire with very simple compression and found that
> they were transferring data faster than previously.
> 
> This will have to stay as anecdotal as I cannot describe the application
> further. 

I understand that you are isolated behind a firewall, but can you at
least say what is meant by "very simple compression"?

-- 
If you understand,                      John Cowan
   things are just as they are;         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand,               http://www.reutershealth.com
   things are just as they are.         jcowan@r...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev@b...>

• References:
  • Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread