[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 20:13, Jay Vaughan wrote:

> Do we *HAVE* to use the xml-dev list for SCO diatribe?  Is it really 
> that pertinent?  I'm not trying to be insulting to anyone - I'm just 
> trying to stop the constant banter and misuse of this list, which is 
> supposed to be (as advertised) about XML development and related 
> technologies.

I wouldn't have said it like this (and have already said it), but I
can't disagree...

IMO at least 50% of the posts on xml-dev are off topic (not counting the
permathreads) and I would have left for long if it wasn't a unique
source of information and (on-topic) debate.

Maybe I should just start training SpamBayes on xml-dev posts and stop
complaining?

Eric
-- 
Don't you think all these XML schema languages should work together?
                                                         http://dsdl.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member