• To: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Subject: Re: Must SOAP-based array types be insufficiently validatable?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:46:02 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <039f01c34fa2$7aa02e00$ae00a8c0@jmg>
• References: <039f01c34fa2$7aa02e00$ae00a8c0@jmg>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Jeff Greif wrote:
> The web services industry has chosen, via the WSDL and SOAP specs, to use
> the W3C XML Schema system by default (others are possible, but rarely used).
> However, the XML exchanged using these specs sometimes cannot be validated
> fully by a pure WXS processor that isn't also a SOAP processor.  I'm curious
> to see if anyone knows a way to improve the situation.

This may be one of the reasons why the web services industry (WS-I :)
has said that RPC-encoded SOAP is on its way out, and literal XML 
document exchange (doc/lit) is the way to go.
	/r$

• References:
  • Must SOAP-based array types be insufficiently validatable?
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Sun is forking SAX
• Next by Date: RE: Must SOAP-based array types be insufficiently validatable?
• Previous by thread: Must SOAP-based array types be insufficiently validatable?
• Next by thread: RE: Must SOAP-based array types be insufficiently validatable?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread