• To: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Subject: Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
• From: Paul Spencer <ps@b...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:36:59 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <f5bisqlcm6e.fsf@e...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173A60@R...> <lhl2gvgbdpbjm802p7edhko4hhg79o28c2@4...> <006a01c33fe8$13d98190$6403a8c0@capernum> <v1e3gvo4ns4dql8m8pinqfr2scqfmf3fur@4...> <013001c3407b$475edc20$1401a8c0@snobird> <f5bisqlcm6e.fsf@e...>

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:28:25 +0100, you wrote:

>There's a
>sort of critical-mass phenomenon at work -- once there are enough
>decent validators, the pressure to fix bugs goes up.  So keep sending
>bug reports to the vendors whose products you use!

But not so good when vendors start making you pay for a support
contract before you can report a bug! At least one introduced this
recently.

Regards

Paul Spencer

• References:
  • RE: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: Paul Spencer <ps@b...>
  • Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
  • Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: Paul Spencer <ps@b...>
  • Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: attribute abstract
• Next by Date: Re: Allowed PEReference usages
• Previous by thread: Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread