• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:55:48 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3F29C46E.55988222@s...>

james.anderson@s... (james anderson) writes:
>despite the truism, that the generic identifer is just a special
>attribute, what is the advantage to making the universal depend on the
>ideosyncratic?

That it's local.

I guess I just don't value the universal enough to participate in your
world.

>> >is /@ that much more difficult than / ?
>> 
>> What language are you speaking?  If that's XPath, I didn't think we
>> were in the classic elements/attributes tussle.
>
>think again.

I guess you're not fond of architectural forms either?


-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• References:
  • Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Next by Date: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• Previous by thread: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• Next by thread: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread