• To: Allen Razdow <arazdow@m...>
• Subject: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:52:51 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <CBEAE06ADC8F9A4BB9E92B4441FA90BE3C7B1E@m...>
• References: <CBEAE06ADC8F9A4BB9E92B4441FA90BE3C7B1E@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Allen Razdow wrote:

>  In contrast, XML represents data
> as annotated trees in a standard syntax ruled by Schemas

No, not ruled by Schemas.  A substantial proportion of XML has never 
felt the touch of a Schema of any kind and works fine.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • RE: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
    • From: "Allen Razdow" <arazdow@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Next by Date: Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread