• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: How did "public identifier" get its name...
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:31:22 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC706@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC706@h...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> The problem of the Universal Identifier concept is that 
> it assumes the web is the universe and vice versa.  It 
> builds unreliability into the system.  Definitions that 
> include the term 'universal information space' are silly.

IMHO it would have been better to decree that in XML the public id,
rather than the system id, must be a URI.

-- 
Andrew Watt on Microsoft:                       John Cowan
"Never in the field of human computing          jcowan@r...
has so much been paid by so many                http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to so few!" (pace Winston Churchill)            http://www.reutershealth.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How did "public identifier" get its name...
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• References:
  • RE: How did "public identifier" get its name...
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more politics
• Next by Date: Re: Web Services Framework Interoperability (Was Re: Web Services Composite Application Framework (WS-CAF))
• Previous by thread: RE: How did "public identifier" get its name...
• Next by thread: Re: How did "public identifier" get its name...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread