• To: "Collin" <collin@s...>,"XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Requests for Comments or Request for Comments ?
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:18:37 +0200
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <030e01c351ec$db443d40$cdf09b3d@collin>
• Reply-to: <danny666@v...>

Here it's using the plural "Requests for Comments" rather than the singular
"Request for Comments", though in this context I think it could probably be
either, with "Request for Comments" used as an opaque label. If Mr.Cowan
says different, go with his version ;-)

Requests for Comments (RFCs) are described in Request for Comments (RFC)
2026

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt

Cheers,
Danny.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Collin [mailto:collin@s...]
> Sent: 24 July 2003 14:57
> To: XML DEV
> Cc: www-tag@w...
> Subject:  Requests for Comments or Request for Comments ?
>
>
> [Extracted from 1.1 About this Document in Architecture of the
> World Wide Web]
>
> Readers will benefit from familiarity with the ___Requests for
> Comments___ (RFC) series from the IETF, some of which define
> pieces of the architecture discussed in this document.
>
>
>
> Collin
>
>

• References:
  • Requests for Comments or Request for Comments ?
    • From: "Collin" <collin@s...>

• Prev by Date: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Requests for Comments or Request for Comments ?
• Next by thread: Fragment Identifier Will Become Part of URI ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread