• To: "Jay Vaughan" <jv@a...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:27:21 -0700
• Thread-index: AcNRT+ojOYAkxuMDQ5ubcPHOD5SfcAAACqfA
• Thread-topic: Advice: inline node editing, or not?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Vaughan [mailto:jv@a...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:19 PM
> To: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Advice: inline node editing, or not?
> 
> 
> Well I for one would like to see more technical discussion 
> about XML, and less about the politics of business.  I'm sure 
> I'm not the only one.  If I came across a bit too strong its 
> only because I'm incredibly frustrated at downloading so much 
> XML-DEV mail only to find its some undeniably boring chat 
> between two people who would be better served by the company 
> at slashdot.org ... where there are plenty of other smart 
> monkies to talk about SCO with.

I have to agree with this, its mildly irritating to come into work and
see 53 new messages to XML-DEV from the previous evening only for over
half of them to be Slashdot style discussions on Open Source vs.
Commercial Software. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Any given program, when running, is obsolete.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• Prev by Date: Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Next by Date: Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice:inline node editing, or not?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Next by thread: Re: Advice: inline node editing, or not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread