• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why 3D Redux?
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:58:54 -0400
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC593@h...> <04e201c34b2f$e2cbd0a0$1401a8c0@snobird>

[Bob Foster

> > http://www.parallelgraphics.com/gagarin/
>
> Don't know if you intended it, but this is a good illustration to me why
3D
> isn't more widely used. When I tried to access this
> (http://www.parallelgraphics.com/vrml/gagarin2/3d/index.html) in Mozilla
> 1.1, exactly nothing happened. When I tried in Explorer 6.0.2600, I got a
> request to ok a download of some software, which I did, and then...exactly
> nothing happened.
>
> How is it again that VRML triumphed over Microsoft?
>

I must be luck, it worked on my version on IE (6.0.2800.1106, SP1).  Pretty
nifty.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why 3D Redux?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• References:
  • RE: Why 3D Redux?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Why 3D Redux?
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Non-deterministic content models
• Next by Date: Re: Why 3D Redux?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why 3D Redux?
• Next by thread: Re: Why 3D Redux?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread