[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Simon St.Laurent wrote: >If it was all about the editors, I'm sure we'd all be working in ASN.1 >or some similar opaque and highly-efficient binary dialect. I do about >97% of my XML work in text editors of various flavors, and don't want >someone else's idea of what an editor should do to get in my way. It may seem I use XML editors a lot. I do use XML editors for documents. For all other tasks however, I use a plain text editor. It's just that when you need a CDATA section, you're probably writing a document -- you're not fiddling with code. And when you're writing a document, you're probably working in an XML editor. If not, you're doing things the unusal way. And I question the necessity of a construct which is made for unusual circumstances, in an otherwise minimal syntax. Gustaf
|

Cart



