Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> <!ENTITY % begin '<!ENTITY % value "str'> > <!ENTITY % end 'ing">'> > <!ENTITY % all '%begin;%end;'> > %all; > > This seems valid to me (as well as all other possible constructions of the > 'all' entity that come from recursively expanding PEs). Do others agree? If you interpret the Proper Declaration/PE Nesting validity constraint as applying only to PEReferences outside entity value literals, then what you have is ok, but %begin;%end; instead of %all; would be invalid. Otherwise, not. No doubt someone here knows what was _meant_. Bob Foster
|
