[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) scripsit: > I don't think a mapping to a "canonical UOM" is needed, unless you > intend to use it as a standard route to "infer" missing formulas. Anyway: Easy for you to say: you live in a rational SI world, and don't have to deal with the Fred Flintstone Memorial Measurement System (name tm Markus Kuhn, IIRC) and its close cousin the Former Imperial Glory Measurement System. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Big as a house, much bigger than a house, it looked to [Sam], a grey-clad moving hill. Fear and wonder, maybe, enlarged him in the hobbit's eyes, but the Mumak of Harad was indeed a beast of vast bulk, and the like of him does not walk now in Middle-earth; his kin that live still in latter days are but memories of his girth and his majesty. --"Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit"
|

Cart



