Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Chiusano Joseph wrote: > "This WS-Federation Specification is an initial public draft release and > is provided for review and evaluation only. BEA, IBM, Microsoft, RSA > Security and VeriSign hope to solicit your contributions and suggestions > in the near future." > > I think the reasoning is that the spec is not yet ripe enough for public > comments. Then perhaps it has no business being aired in public (but I doubt that's the reason anyway Joe). > The authors of the Specification intend to submit a revised version of > the Specification to a standards body with a commitment to grant a > royalty-free license to their necessary patents. We need assurance that > your feedback and discussions are consistent with that goal. > </Announcement> That would be good, but it would be better if there was just one. There are enough (some, half-baked) reliability specs out there. > So that is 3 out of (approximately) 18 GSA specifications. My hope is > that more GXA specifications will follow suit. Aside from the obvious 'why do we need 18 ws-glob specs?'.. is anybody implementing these things? Bill de hÓra -- Propylon www.propylon.com
|
