• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RE: OWL-ish question
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:37:11 -0400
• References: <000001c3570f$7841ccd0$6501a8c0@D89FK411>

[Linda Grimaldi]

> Doesn't a restriction apply to all members of a class?  What I am
> looking for will vary in value by instance, not by class.  And since
> instances will be added all the time, I can't subclass and lump
> together.
>

Yes - I thought that by using owl:allValuesFrom, you could restrict the
hasMappingClass to include only those transitive properties (or whatever)
you talked about.  I assumed that those properties would have a class of
their own, which would be the object of owl:allValuesFrom.

> Ah, for true ternary relations  :>).
>

Ah, for Topic Maps... :-)

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: RE: OWL-ish question
    • From: "Linda Grimaldi" <grimlinda@e...>

• Prev by Date: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: OWL-ish question
• Next by thread: Re: RE: OWL-ish question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread