• To: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Subject: Re: xml:base and fragment identifiers
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:28:55 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030723091123.02765f08@p...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030723091123.02765f08@p...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Dave Pawson scripsit:
> 	If I have an xml document with xml:base set to some uri,
> then use a cross reference / link to (what used to be) another id
> in the same document using a fragment identifier, would you expect the 
> target to be
> calculated relative to this same document, or relative to the xml:base 
> value?

RFC 2396 says "this same document"; its predecessor said otherwise.
This may be changed again in son-of-RFC-2396; go to uri@w...
(an open list) if you have comment.

-- 
Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers       John Cowan
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes;        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is      http://www.reutershealth.com
Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus.     jcowan@r...

• References:
  • xml:base and fragment identifiers
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: An approach to describing the relationships between units-of-measure
• Next by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Previous by thread: xml:base and fragment identifiers
• Next by thread: Parsing a DTD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread