• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: new URI dust-up
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:57:06 -0400

There's some good reading over at www-tag on the many "social" issues
surrounding URIs.  The context is RDF-specific, but seems appropriate to
XML URI usage as well.

Original message (TimBL):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html

Contrasting reply (Pat Hayes):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0147.html

There's lots of potentially useful food for thought in there, though I'm
still fond of this formulation:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0301.html

www-tag seems to be coming back to (cranky) life lately, albeit on
familiar territory.  If anyone thinks, for instance, that the W3C,
Apache, and IETF get along magically, try:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0057.html



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Prev by Date: Re: Question for the Math-oriented people: is an assignment a function?
• Next by Date: RE: new URI dust-up
• Previous by thread: RE: Types, schmypes (was: Non-deterministic content models)
• Next by thread: RE: new URI dust-up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread