• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: more politics
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:23:14 -0700
• Cc: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173B30@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173B30@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> The whole "GETs must be side effect free" is a spec bug as far as I'm concerned. I can understand saying that they should be idempotent but besides opening the door to a bunch of metaphysical discussions aboutt "what exactly constitutes a side effect" I don't see what purpose that part of the spec serves. 

Right.  Basically every GET writes a logfile record as a minimum.  I'm 
more comfy with language along the lines of "GET does not incur new 
obligations."  Which is actually functionally necessary for caches and 
proxies to work. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: more politics
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: RE: more politics
• Next by thread: Re: more politics
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread