• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:16:22 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <135.232f136f.2c57f80f@a...>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <135.232f136f.2c57f80f@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
> Robin,
> 
> I wondered why Elliotte was reticent in responding to your points. His 
> Web site indicates he is on holiday until 11th August with the bliss of 
> no Internet access for much/all of that period.

Yes I figured that out when he already didn't answer earlier. Let's just hope 
that he didn't intend to submit a position paper since that's the deadline :)

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: OWL-ish question
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread