• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Xpath Question
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:01:23 -0400
• In-reply-to: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7272CCE@R...>

mrys@m... (Michael Rys) writes:
>XPath 1.0 has no conformance requirement on what data model a parser
>needs to generate.
>
>Unless you have an explicit xml:space="preserve" set, the generation of
>the datamodel as a consumer of the output of the XML parser (which
>always preserves all the whitespace) can drop the boundary whitespace
>text nodes.

Then I guess you're saying that the XPath 1.0 model is useless if you
want a reliably consistent model of a given XML document?  

Oh well.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Xpath Question
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • RE: Xpath Question
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Xpath Question
• Next by Date: RE: Xpath Question
• Previous by thread: RE: Xpath Question
• Next by thread: RE: Xpath Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread