• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:37:28 -0500

At least it is easy to see now how SGML became as 
complex as it did over time.  What doesn't get 
put into XML shows up in the applications.  It 
will be fun as some of us get closer to retirement 
and watch the next generation of "we can do this 
simpler and better".

Cars and jets never get simpler overall.  Why 
do people believe software should?

len

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

At the same time, this seems to reconfirm my "reinventing unparsed
entities" theory, which is more than a little amusing after SOAP
banished DOCTYPE declarations.  SGML looks better every day!

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism
• Next by Date: Re: An approach to describing the relationships betweenunits-of-measure
• Previous by thread: SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism
• Next by thread: RE: SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread