• To: "Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: rss regularis(z)ation
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:39:11 -0700
• Thread-index: AcNP+R+7xpYpklaUROmCI7t3Cku1fwACbDZx
• Thread-topic: rss regularis(z)ation

Your comments do not reflect my experiences with the world of RSS. Can you clarify with concrete examples instead of generalisms? 

________________________________

From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]
Sent: Mon 7/21/2003 7:28 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  rss regularis(z)ation



.  Are those
resisting namespaces just being stupid/stubborn, or are they the "canaries
in the coalmines" dropping over from the toxic namespace fumes?  I don't
know ... but I hear the sound of people voting with their feet.  Maybe the
XML Supreme Court should steal the election and suspend civil rights until
this non-orthodoxy is corrected :-)  But seriously, this challenges the XML
world to show that the namespace spec really adds more benefit than cost in
the real world, or to clean it up until it  does.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by Date: RE: rss regularis(z)ation
• Previous by thread: RE: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by thread: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread