• To: MDaconta@a...
• Subject: Re: Relax NG and Web Services (formerly Joining the church)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:13:10 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1dc.d9de900.2c3de5dc@a...>
• References: <1dc.d9de900.2c3de5dc@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

MDaconta@a... wrote:

>> So, having now done one serious (albeit small) project with RelaxNG, I 
>> really REALLY wonder why anyone would use anything else?

> While WSDL 1.2 fixes this, it is not yet a recommendation.  And WSDL 1.1
> states, "For maximum interoperability and platform neutrality, WSDL 
> prefers the use of XSD as the canonical type system, and treats it as 
> the intrinsic type system."

Any reason you couldn't work it out in RelaxNG, and then use the 
generated XSD in the WSDL?

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • Re: Relax NG and Web Services (formerly Joining the church)
    • From: MDaconta@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: Motivations for namespaces (sorry)
• Next by Date: Exceptions while parsing!
• Previous by thread: Re: Relax NG and Web Services (formerly Joining the church)
• Next by thread: Re: Relax NG and Web Services (formerly Joining the church)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread