• To: <xml-dev@l...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:04:37 -0500
• References: <oprstl350fezizxn@localhost> <1059081111.4420.39.camel@z...> <oprsubx3qbezizxn@localhost>

> I think a better way to think about at least what *I* am 
> interested in is "performance-optimized Infoset serialization."  (POIS?) 
> That could cover a lot of possibilities, and potentially could be 
> essentially textual but faster to parse.

You mean, where I != PSVI?

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml-utterly-practical (was RE: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread