• To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:57:56 -0500
• Cc: "'veillard@r...'" <veillard@r...>, xml-dev@l...

Agree.  It translates to 'riskier' and that has to be 
asserted to the business that assumes the risk.  First 
in the chain are the insurance companies.  I believe 
that nails down this topic.

len

From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]

> Because the risk is possible, not having
> covered it means the business model (not the software product)
> is not credible.

"not credible" is way too strong; perhaps "less credible"
	/r$

• Prev by Date: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by Date: Re: Parsing a DTD
• Previous by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread