• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why 3D Redux?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 03:00:30 +1000
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC58A@h...>

 From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
 
> I don't know if it is wiring.  I am told we are wired for  3D 
> but that the expense of representation is high so we 
> long ago enculturated by technology, the 2D representations, and 
> now we hang on to that technology by habit and market force

But a 3D person *would* say that :-)

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: Why 3D Redux?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why 3D Redux?
• Next by Date: RE: Why 3D Redux?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why 3D Redux?
• Next by thread: RE: Why 3D Redux?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread