• To: Collin <collin@s...>
• Subject: Re: About the number for productions in [XML 1.0SE]
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:24:04 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <003301c33d5a$1fc3c320$7d0977ca@collin>
• References: <003301c33d5a$1fc3c320$7d0977ca@collin>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Collin scripsit:
> I find that the number for productions in [XML 1.0 SE] is not consecutive.
> For example, there are production [32] and production [39]. However, productions [33]~[38] are missing.

They were deleted by an erratum, as they were not actually referenced
by any other production, and overlapped what RFC 1766/3066 (which is
normatively referenced) said anyhow.

> (Were they deleted for some reason?)
> 
> Collin

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo

• Prev by Date: ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.2 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter
• Next by Date: RE: Handling of significant whitespace in .NET XmlReader
• Previous by thread: ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.2 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter
• Next by thread: RE: Handling of significant whitespace in .NET XmlReader
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread