• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: more politics
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:11:52 -0400
• References: <BD2DBD26EE0BAA48B1A425C7BE7923002D0583@c...>

[Micah Dubinko
> It seems the Semantic Web is not meant to be read, but interpreted. :-)
>
> > ... cannot be the same URI on pain of contradiction.
>
> That sounds about right. If two assertions using the same subject URI
> conflict, then a logical contradiction takes place. It's bound to happen
one
> way or another.
>

And that will happen anyway from time to time, even with no ambiguity about
the subject of a URI.  One way or the other, it will have to be dealt with
on a regular basis.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: more politics
    • From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more politics
• Next by Date: Re: Re: An approach to describing the relationships betweenunits-of-measure
• Previous by thread: RE: more politics
• Next by thread: Re: more politics
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread