• To: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>,"Jeni Tennison" <jeni@j...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:04:48 -0700
• Thread-index: AcNNdV2/78KBbtNfQF2xVSnpbMB04QAFABmc
• Thread-topic: Defining non-WXS datatypes

I don't remember writing anything about default namespaces. What comment of mine are you referencing? 

________________________________

From: Bob Foster [mailto:bob@o...]
Sent: Fri 7/18/2003 2:54 PM
To: Jeni Tennison; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Defining non-WXS datatypes


Unlike Dare, I see no problem with a default namespace. This works well in
RELAX NG and is especially handy when including fragments developed or
"repurposed" to be used with multiple namespaces.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Xquery and XSLT?
• Next by Date: RE: the web client interface was RE: Two linkquestions
• Previous by thread: RE: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Next by thread: Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread