[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:16:27 -0500

That would suggest that the problem today is not 
technical or political, but a matter of education. 
There simply are XML languages for which CSS is 
not useful or available.  There are applications 
of CSS which are simpler and more elegant.  Without 
discrimination, one will stumble.

A spork is a technically effective tool, but not 
well-liked.

len


From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

Maybe more XML folks should spend time on web design lists and watch the 
cycle of people trying to decide if this weird pointy XSLT stuff is worth 
learning, and what it costs.  Some people do make it past the learning 
curve, while lots of other people wonder why this extra layer of stuff is 
needed (especially in IE) to work with XML.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member