• To: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@b...>
• Subject: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 23:20:16 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20030704233806.00b1b2c0@p...>
• References: <3.0.6.32.20030704233806.00b1b2c0@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Gustaf Liljegren wrote:

> What is the current opinion about CDATA sections? Keep or scrap?

I use them all the time to write 'ongoing'.  There are other ways I 
could accomplish this, but CDATA sections are less work, and all the 
tools support them, and I really don't see any chance of them vanishing. 
  Doesn't mean I like them, they're kinda ugly.  But so are lots of 
useful things.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • How important are CDATA sections?
    • From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Next by Date: Re: How to define separate schema definition for the same element type...
• Previous by thread: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Next by thread: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread