Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Thomas B. Passin" wrote: > > ... > > More to the point, the pruning will probably need to take some more human > input along the way, which sounds like several passes to me. I am not sure > how far the person involved wants to go in paring down the schema. I > suspect he wants to be fairly draconian about it. > upon examination, i reminded myself that cl-xml already serializes the dtd through a recursive walk over the type model, as this is necessary in order to emit sensible namespace declarations. thus, changing it to accomplish the simple form of this was a matter of disabling its second pass over the document definition which would normally ensure that un-referenced types appear in the document type definition. that exercise made the trick part of the question apparent: what kinds of transformations are intended for the content models? a reduction to that which appears in the document, replacement of unreferenced types with ANY? ...
|
