• To: Michael Rys <mrys@m...>
• Subject: Re: Xpath Question
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:57:32 -0700
• Cc: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>,xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7272CCE@R...>
• References: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7272CCE@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Michael Rys wrote:

> Sorry but this is FUD.
> 
> XPath 1.0 has no conformance requirement on what data model a parser
> needs to generate.

So, MSXML is existence proof that it's possible to be both conformant 
and wrong.  But we already knew that.  -Tim

• References:
  • RE: Xpath Question
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Xpath Question
• Next by Date: RE: Xpath Question
• Previous by thread: RE: Xpath Question
• Next by thread: RE: Xpath Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread