• To: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: The Legend of 'View Source'
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:23:07 -0400
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AB8@R...>

At 05:29 PM 7/8/2003 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>When I first decided to generate an RSS feed for my personal online 
>journal, I looked at Sam and Don's feeds as examples of what my feed 
>should look like and for the most part it worked.

That's what I did with FOAF as well.

All seemed fine until I encountered Bill Kearney's perfectly legitimate but 
very different FOAF file - and then I had to reconsider all the XSLT work 
I'd done with FOAF.  I'm sure there are more reconsiderations ahead in that 
space because of flexibility that doesn't surface in even a reasonably 
large sample of "View Source" exploration.

http://simonstl.com/projects/foaf-xml

• References:
  • RE: The Legend of 'View Source'
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: Fwd: RFC 3548 on The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings
• Previous by thread: RE: The Legend of 'View Source'
• Next by thread: RE: The Legend of 'View Source'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread