• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: [Mailer-Daemon@m...: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 10:41:36 -0400
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

David Megginson scripsit:

> Seriously, CDATA sections were only a small part of a whole load of
> gratuitously obfuscated syntax carried over from SGML to XML 1.0 

I'de be interested to know what other features you think fall into
this category.

-- 
XQuery Blueberry DOM                            John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com                           jcowan@r...
    Abstract schemata                           http://www.reutershealth.com
    XPointer errata                             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Infoset Unicode BOM                                 --Richard Tobin

• Prev by Date: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Next by Date: XML Parsing
• Previous by thread: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Next by thread: XML Parsing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread