Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Why aren't defined patterns named with QNames? That would make portability so much easier! Such as: ] <pattern xmlns:jfc="My Namespace for Patterns"> ] <define name="jfc:mypattern" /> ] </pattern> Why isn't there a more complete datatyping language? Sure, W3C XML Schema can often be ugly; however, it can also be elegant too. Why can't I specify unions and extensions of XML Schema datatypes? Why can't I specify non-whitespace separated lists? Such as (I.E. "NCName|anyURI"): ] <list separator="|"> ] <data type="NCname" /> ] <data type="anyURI" /> ] </list> Why can't I do that in Relax NG? I understand that it was designed to eliminate perceived annoyances with W3C XML Schema; however, Relax NG has a bunch of annoyances to call its own. :-/ -- Jimmy Cerra ] "XML is just syntax, and you can therefore ] use it any way you like." - Michael Kay P.S. If you can, indeed, do the above, then please tell me how! Sorry for the rant, too.
|
