• To: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...>
• Subject: RE: rss regularis(z)ation
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:06:58 +0200
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <20030723124633.GP2811@m...>
• Reply-to: <danny666@v...>

> > No, me neither. I personally think that XML namespaces are the
> right choice
> > here, but the process is very much at fault if the decision
> isn't made in a
> > clearly consensual  way. (is consensual a word? - sounds smutty)
>
> It is a word, but semantically it is tied to "consent" rather than
> "consensus", which have become somewhat divergent in meaning.
> (Consensual sex is precisely sex between the consenting.)
> I think you want "the decision isn't arrived at by consensus."

Thanks John. The "-sensual" confused me a little, but it must have been
"consensual sex" I had in mind. Which segues unnaturally into the
pronunciation of RSS...

Cheers,
Danny.

http://dannyayers.com/misc/bits/arse.wav

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: An approach to describing the relationships betweenunits-of-measure
• Next by Date: Re: Re: An approach to describing the relationships between units-of-measure
• Previous by thread: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by thread: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread