• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:28:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030618215608.03279ae8@s...>

> It's hubris to say that "because I want this goddamn feature, you're all
> going to have it too."

Touche'.

To me it fits in the 80 part of 80/20, but maybe my viewpoint is too
narrow.

Game over.
	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • 80/20(was Re: modeling, validating )
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: 80/20(was Re: modeling, validating )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread