• To: "'veillard@r...'" <veillard@r...>, Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:58:18 -0700
• Cc: "'Roger L. Costello'" <costello@m...>, xml-dev@l...

>   I agree with you that pure number of page count from a spec 
> might not
> be a good indicator of the actual complexity of implementation though.

How about reserved word count?

• Prev by Date: [Fwd: Re: Documents, data and markup: YAML Ain't MarkupLanguage]
• Next by Date: Re: More on namespaces...
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread