• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• From: "Caton, Paul" <Paul_Caton@b...>
• Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:51:31 -0400
• Thread-index: AcMryTDIIvbFSp6USSCqijHhYfeSdgAX5RsA
• Thread-topic: Does SAX make sense?

I don't know, Patrick, maybe I'm confused but the line you quoted:

>> Another advantage is that it operates with standard XML syntax,
>> unlike some proposals, such as LMNL, which has its own (non-XML)
format.

to me parses as "X operates with standard XML syntax, unlike Y", and so
I don't understand how you then say:

>> Did not make any claims about it not being able to operate with 
>> standard XML syntax

How did you not claim that? What am I missing here?

Paul Caton.

• Prev by Date: Re: XML websites
• Next by Date: Re: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread