• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:39:47 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC46A@h...>

At 10:42 AM 6/20/2003 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Are the W3C implementations *reference* implementations
>or *sample* implementations?  IOW, how is the implementation
>tied to the specification in terms of features and proof
>of conforming and compliant implementation?  Are any public source?
>Are they tied normatively to the spec or informatively?

This information is not public, certainly not a spec-by-spec basis.

 From what I can gather, different Working Groups appear to have very 
different criteria, but few of them take the time to explain the criteria, 
at least in public.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Create XML
• Next by Date: Call for Volunteers: V1 International Representatives
• Previous by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread