• To: "Erik Bruchez" <erik@b...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:53:24 -0700
• Thread-index: AcM2irsr072OGe1RQ6CWi1yGaoSemgAAPLLx
• Thread-topic: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

<broken-record>This mentality is everything that is wrong with XML development today</broken-record>

________________________________

From: Erik Bruchez [mailto:erik@b...]
Sent: Thu 6/19/2003 10:45 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0



Uche Ogbuji wrote:


 >>it is definitely not standard
 >
 > What do you mean?  What do you call "standard"?

No time to go through the archives so here is my "facile" answer: I
call standard a specification released by one of the major standard
bodies out there, such as W3C, ECMA, ISO, etc. I understand why this
may or may not be important to different people so no need to start a
big argument here, but if you can summarize your position in a
sentence or two go ahead.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Erik Bruchez <erik@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CDATA processing problem using Xerces-J validating parser
• Next by Date: RE: CDATA processing problem using Xerces-J validating parser
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread