• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:03:50 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3EF164F4.9070607@s...>
• References: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFEEOODOAA.mike@w...><AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFEEOODOAA.mike@w...>

At 12:23 AM 6/19/2003 -0700, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
>Just for the record, I think any standards committee that *doesn't* follow 
>the principle of "if in doubt, leave it out" should be forced to keep 
>circulating their ever more bloated specification amongst themselves in a 
>feedback cycle until their mail servers all crash and the evil product of 
>their activities is lost to the bit bucket. WXS seemed to be firmly on 
>this track, but somehow the damned thing escaped to the wild before the 
>inevitable collapse. I consider it a virus.

Hmmm... maybe we actually need fewer public drafts rather than more.  Cruel 
gatekeepers might help.  Or perhaps we should encourage a greater sense of 
shame among specification developers?

Tough political problem, certainly.

• References:
  • RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: 80/20(was Re: modeling, validating )
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread