• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:02:38 -0700
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0306182035290.809-100000@s...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0306182035290.809-100000@s...>

Rich Salz wrote:
>
> Perhaps folks really mean "this is the final straw, making XSD so
> complex that as validation-implementors we cannot stand for it."
> But that is not what they've been saying.

Heavens, no!  minOccurs and maxOccurs aren't even the
preantepenultimate straw; they're inconsequential
bits of fluff compared to the rest of the camelbackbreaking
mass of complexity in W3C XML Schema :-)



--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread