• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:26:45 -0400
• In-reply-to: <f5bsmqppy1d.fsf@e...>

ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
>The objective publicly available information consists of the texts of
>all the Director's Decision announcements, which all contain a
>discussion of the AC input.  On the basis of this public record, it is
>evident that _any_ hard negative input is taken extremely seriously,
>and seen to require significant justification and/or ameliorative
>action if the decision is to go ahead.

Where can I find these archived?  Patent Policy seems to be the only one
that comes up easily, and they don't appear to be linked from the
documents to which they apply.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by thread: RE: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread