Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"K. Ari Krupnikov" wrote: > > james anderson <james.anderson@s...> writes: > > > "K. Ari Krupnikov" wrote: > > > > > > Arjun Ray <aray@n...> writes: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > So instead of /a:foo/b:bar, you'd write > > > /foo[@xmlns='a-role']/bar[@xmlns='b-role'] > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > > > > i believe the complete proposal includes (or at least suggests) a dom access > > layer which effects the relabeling and permits > > > > /foo/bar > > Clearly, this XPath matches a superset of nodes matched by the one > above. > not necessarily. one way to think of xmlns-based relabeling is that it translates label-sets (conceived in a two-d plane) from a set of variably located lines specified by the prefixes to a single constant line specified by the namespace name. one way to think of attribute-based relabeling is that it translates label sets from a constant origin line to a set of variably located lines specified by the attribute values. the size of the respective sets of labels does not change. ...
|
