• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:15:24 -0700
• Thread-index: AcM2Bp6nomxhAN4+QA+U/HtNgC5iXgAChxYw
• Thread-topic: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:04 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  modeling, validating and documenting 
> an xml grammar
> 
> >Nobody's refuted the calendar set of examples.
> 
> Sure, it's useful.  Does it belong in a schema describing 
> markup?  No, I don't think so.  I don't think it adds any 
> more value than the current calendar disaster the WXS 
> datatypes have already created with gHorribleKludge.  

What disaster? 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
You will always find something in the last place you look.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Meta-models for schemas
• Next by thread: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread