• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:49:37 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648446C@R...>

At 10:20 10/06/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>Of course, a lot of the gains you claim come from moving from XSLT 1.0 to 
>XSLT 2.0 can be gained by simply extending XSLT's function library. Look 
>at http://www.exslt.org or 
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnexxml/html/xml05192003.asp for 
>examples of what I mean.

Having struggled with a stylesheet for a day and a half,
I re-wrote it in XSLT 1.0, with 3 of Mike Kays extensions.
It worked.
It was far quicker,
It was comprehensible.
It didn't need the data typing.

The only benefits I see are the incorporation of exslt functionality.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Sample expat code for reading entities?
• Next by Date: Re: Sample expat code for reading entities?
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread