• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:09:11 -0700
• Thread-index: AcMugv4wcapXPfffT/mXRlFbmHKVlgAPmDTw
• Thread-topic: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bryan [mailto:bry@i...] 
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:27 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> 
> 
> I was hoping someone could send me some pointers to 
> interesting parts of the xml schema [expletive deleted] perma-thread with 
> special attention given to contested areas of the 
> specification leading to vendor incompatible implementations.


Complex type restriction. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Any small object when dropped will hide under a larger object.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• Next by Date: RE: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• Previous by thread: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: most contested area of xml schema interoperability?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread