• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:05:59 -0700
• Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>, "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <214e01c3360f$af60ec80$1401a8c0@snobird>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0306182035290.809-100000@s...> <214e01c3360f$af60ec80$1401a8c0@snobird>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Bob Foster wrote:

>Going back over the RELAX NG archives, the recorded discussion of
>minOccurs/maxOccurs was focused on requirements, not implementation. The
>committee apparently couldn't make a strong case for the feature, and "if in
>doubt, leave it out" carried the day.
>
Wow, what a hidebound approach to design! Good thing the WXS crew didn't 
have such a regressive attitude.

  - Dennis

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CDATA processing problem using Xerces-J validating parser
• Next by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread